CWS Market Review – March 11, 2011
On Thursday, the S&P 500 closed below its 50-day moving average for the first time since Labor Day. The index snapped its amazing streak of 130-straight days closing above its 50-DMA. That’s the seventh-longest streak in the last 75 years.
The damage was pretty bad on Thursday. The S&P 500 lost 1.89% which was its worst break since the post-President’s Day sell-off of February 22nd. The index closed at 1,295.11 on Thursday and the Dow dropped 229.48 points to close at 11,984.61. For the first time since January, the S&P 500 is below 1,300 and the Dow is below 12,000. In the last five weeks, the S&P 500 has had daily drops of 1.5% or more four times. In the five months prior to that, it happened just twice.
The stocks that were particularly hard hit on Thursday were the cyclicals (stop me if you’ve heard this one before). The Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index ($CYC) was off by 2.14% which is 0.25% worse than the S&P 500. Oil was down sharply due to the unrest in Saudi Arabia and that’s why many energy stocks got dinged by 3% or more. ExxonMobil ($XOM), for example, lost $15 billion in market value today which is roughly equal to watching the entire market value of Xerox ($XRX) vanish before our eyes.
On days like Thursday, I’m happy we don’t have any energy stocks on the Buy List. It’s not a macro-economic decision on my part. It’s simply that I haven’t spotted any energy stocks that I thought were “must buys.”
Whenever stocks go down, it seems like bonds are required to rally, and that’s exactly what we saw on Thursday. There was particular strength in shorter-term maturities. Even the microscopic yield on the three-month Treasury bill got…well…even more microscopic. The three-month T-bill dropped down to 0.065% which is its lowest yield in nearly nine months.
To add some context for you, that 0.065% yield means that if you were to buy a $1 million T-bill, you’d make $1.78 per day for the next three months. That’s probably the sum total of what’s kept in your average convenience store’s "take-a-penny tray." This is also why, despite my near-term concerns, I’m still a market bull. Any way you look at it, the investing math favors stocks.
At the longer end of the yield curve, the yield on the five-year Treasury fell below 2.1% and the ten-year is now below 3.4%. Both are at the lowest yields in five weeks. This signifies that investors became more risk averse which is the opposite of the larger market trend since last summer.
I’ve written before that the most important outcome of the Fed’s QE2 policy is that it pushes investors out of ultra-conservative assets and forces them to take on riskier assets. This is very good for our Buy List. It also tells us that there’s no use wasting your time in T-bills that will yield next to nothing while there are fundamentally sound stocks, like Reynolds American ($RAI), that pay generous dividends.
As I said last week, I think the most likely scenario for the next few weeks will be a range-bound market. Historically, breaking below the 50-DMA signals a flattish market. I’m also concerned that the stream of positive earnings guidance has begun to dry up. Perhaps this will change when Q1 earnings season begins next month. The key fact is that markets generally don’t double in two years, so everyone needs some rest right about now.
The good news is that our Buy List is doing exactly what it’s designed to do-hold up well when everyone else gets nervous. We’ve outperformed the S&P 500 for the last three days, and since February 23rd, the S&P 500 is down 0.94% while the Buy List is up 0.22%. That’s pretty good for a well-diversified portfolio. For the year, we’re beating the S&P 500 by 1.5%. I think that lead will grow wider once earnings season starts in another month.
In last week’s e-letter, I said that Jos. A Bank Clothiers ($JOSB) looks like it might be the next one of our stocks to break out, and that’s pretty much what happened. While everyone else was in a sour mood on Thursday, shares of JOSB jumped 3.33% and nearly hit a new 52-week high.
I like JOSB a lot but I need to explain an unusual tick in JOSB’s business cycle. Actually, this is common for many retailers. JOSB ends their fiscal year on January 31st so they can include the entire holiday shopping season in Q4. Historically, the company makes close to half their annual profit during the fourth quarter.
Since their Q4 results take a bit longer to compile than the other quarters’ results, we probably won’t get their Q4 earnings report until late March or probably early April. Bear in mind what this means: in early April, we’ll be learning what happened in November, December and January. That’s a long time-lag. After the Q4 report, it’s usually about two months until the Q1 report comes out in early June.
Wall Street currently expects JOSB to report earnings of $1.44 per share for Q4 which is likely too low. I expect EPS of $1.50 or more. The details tell us that JOSB is a very solid stock. The company has posted higher year-over-year earnings for 36 of the last 37 quarters including the last 18 in a row. If you’re looking to add JOSB, I’d wait for a pull back below $45 which we may get in the next few weeks. JOSB isn’t worth chasing in a flat market. Let the bargains come to you.
Let me name a couple of stocks that look good right now. First is AFLAC ($AFL). The shares just fell under $56. I’ve been saying for a while that AFLAC should make a run at $60.
Ford ($F) has pulled back much more than I thought it would. I had thought the stock was about to break $20 but that seems very doubtful. This is a good stock, but the company didn’t communicate well with Wall Street and therefore, it’s being punished. The selling is getting a bit overdone. Ford’s recovery is going so well that it’s considering ditching its valuation allowance held against deferred tax assets. This could add $10 billion to $13 billion in profits this year. Ford is a good buy at $14.
Finally, Johnson & Johnson ($JNJ) closed at its lowest price in six months. As blue chips go, you really can’t get much bluer than JNJ. The current quarterly dividend of 54 cents per share works out to an annual yield of 3.62%. That’s more than a 10-year Treasury, and at this point, JNJ is probably a better risk than the U.S. government.
On top of that, JNJ will probably announce another dividend increase next month. They’ve increased their payout every year for the last 48 years so another one shouldn’t be a surprise. If they raise their dividend by another five cents per share, that would bring the yield to 4%. JNJ is a very good buy.
That’s all for now. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
Best – Eddy
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on March 11th, 2011 at 8:37 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005