CWS Market Review – August 12, 2011
As dramatic as the markets were last week, things got even more frenetic this week. Over the past four days, the Dow closed down 634, up 429, down 519 and up 423. On Thursday, the S&P 500 closed at almost exactly the same level it closed at two days before. It’s like watching some crazy football play where the running back scampers all over the field only to wind up back at the line of scrimmage.
In this week’s issue of CWS Market Review, I want to break down what’s happening and why, but I also want to tell investors what’s the best strategy to do with their money. The silver lining in all this crazy volatility is that there are some impressive bargains right now on our Buy List.
The big story of this past week, outside the down/up/down/up market, was Tuesday’s Fed meeting. Over the past several months, these FOMC meetings have been snoozefests. After all, what can you do when interest rates are already at 0%? This time, however, the Fed actually made some news.
In the post-meeting policy statement, they added important new language:
The Committee currently anticipates that economic conditions–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run–are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013.
Bear in mind that central bankers are bred to speak in understated tones, so this statement is a pretty big deal. What Bernanke & Co. are saying is that the economy and inflation will be soft for at least two more years (which includes Election Day, by the way). Many folks in the market had suspected this was the case, but this is the first time we’ve heard the news right from Big Ben himself.
What’s happening is that S&P’s downgrade of our debt, while a bit silly in my opinion, is having major repercussions, though interestingly, not on the market for our debt. The S&P downgrade took the idea of further fiscal stimulus off the table. In other words, don’t expect Congress to act. More stimulus spending takes political will and that simply no longer exists.
Without the possibility of fiscal stimulus, all responsibility is placed on monetary policy—meaning the Federal Reserve. As a result we’ve been experiencing this odd combination of soaring Treasuries and soaring gold combined with weak and highly volatile stocks. Everyone is running for cover. Gold is soaring because it acts as a hedge against real short-term interest rates. As long as short-term rates are running below inflation, gold is poised to do well. It’s as if Bernanke gave commodity investors the green light—or perhaps the gold light.
What also made this past Fed meeting interesting is that there were three dissensions to the Fed policy statement. The Fed isn’t like the Supreme Court. They work very hard to get the effect of the broad consensus. If someone disagreed, then they really didn’t like the policy. The vote for the last policy statement was 7-3. There are currently two vacancies but we do have to wonder if it’s possible for Bernanke to be overruled at some point by the inflation hawks. That hasn’t happened to a Fed chair in 25 years.
What’s really stood out in my mind is the dramatic volatility of the past few days. I have a slightly different view of volatility than you often hear in the financial media. Volatility isn’t necessarily bad for the market. I think periods of high volatility reflect the violent clashing of multiple views on what’s driving the market. It’s as if two schools of thought are fighting for supremacy.
The bone-on contention is what shape the economy is in right now. Some investors think we’re headed right back for another recession. Personally, I think it’s too early to say. However, I do believe that it’s best for investors to lighten up on their economically-sensitive stocks. I also think we’ll see this crazy volatility begin to fade once traders get back from the beach after Labor Day.
Many financial stocks have come in for an especially severe pounding this month, but I think that’s become overdone, especially for the high-quality ones. In the CWS Market Review from four weeks ago, I said that I was “particularly leery” of financials like Citigroup ($C), Bank of America ($BAC) and Morgan Stanley ($MS). Since then, those three banks have fallen 22%, 28% and 14% respectively. As bad as they are, every stock has a price.
On our Buy List, I think financials like JPMorgan Chase ($JPM) and AFLAC ($AFL) are very good buys. Not only is Nicholas Financial ($NICK) a great buy but I think the recent Fed news actually helps them since short-term rates will continue to be very low for some time. NICK makes their money on the spread between short-term rates and what they lend out to their customers.
For investors, the important lesson is that when times get difficult, you always want to look at dividends. Accountants can do crazy things with a balance sheet, but dividends tend to be very stable. Even during the past recession, once you discount the financial sector, most dividends hung in there. That’s why I want to highlight some of the top yielders on the Buy List.
Abbott Labs ($ABT), for example, is now yielding 3.7%. Even Johnson & Johnson ($JNJ) is yielding close to 3.5%. AFLAC ($AFL) is over 3% and Medtronic ($MDT) isn’t far behind. Tiny Deluxe ($DLX) saw its yield come close to 5%. Most of these companies can easily cover their dividends, and a few have paid rising dividends for decades.
On Monday, Sysco ($SYY) will be our final earnings report of the second quarter. From what I see, the company is in pretty good shape. Wall Street expects earnings of 57 cents per share which is exactly what SYY earned a year ago. I think that’s a bit low. My numbers say that Sysco earned 60 cents per share, plus or minus two cents.
I think it’s interesting that the recent market pullback has impacted a non-cyclical stock like Sysco far less dramatically than it has the rest of the market. Even in this market, Sysco currently yields 3.6% which is a very good deal. The company has increased its dividend for the past 41-straight years and I think they’ll make it 42-straight in November, although it will probably be a one-cent increase. Still, that’s not bad in an environment where a 10-year Treasury goes for just over 2%.
That’s all for now. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on August 12th, 2011 at 11:25 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005