Watching the Yuan
One of my many, many complaints about the financial media is its alarmism. (This also applies to some prominent financial academics as well.) Everyday, it seems, we’re told about a new Major Concern, that Must Concern Us All. If not addressed, the Major Concern will become a Serious Problem with Serious Repercussions. The longer we ignored the Major Concern, the worse it will get.
And usually, the Major Concern goes away. Sometimes it’s replaced by a younger and thinner Major Concern. Remember the Housing Bubble? It turns out, that was sooo last year. Nowadays, we have to be worried about oil prices. And gold prices! Don’t forget copper! Of course, no one ever calls it a gas bubble (okay, all bubbles are gases, smartie).
In the media’s eyes, when the bad things go up, we’re selfish users. When good things go up, we’re selfish speculators. If you pay attention, you might be able to spot some similarities.
Anywho, there really are things to worry about. But usually, they’re not what everyone else is worried about. And that’s what makes them so troubling. The real mischief is hidden in broad daylight.
Yesterday, China allowed its currency, the yuan, to rise above eight to the dollar (meaning lower than eight, confusing I know). In foreign currency terms, this was a tiny move, about 0.1%. But on the symbolism front, it’s equivalent to one enormous spring roll.
The Chinese government is slowly falling to pressure from the United States to adopt a “more flexible” currency policy. More flexible is diplospeak for “higher dammit.” The U.S. has been seriously pissed that China has pegged its currency too low. Last year, China finally allowed its currency to float. Well…not float float. I guess you could call it “semi-submerged.”
So now everyone is happy that the yuan is going up. Almost everyone. Enter Robert Mundell. He thinks a stronger yuan is a big, massive dumb ass mistake. Although he’s an economist, he might know what he’s talking about. Mundell is one the world’s leading currency experts. He’s a Nobel laureate and considered to be the Father of the Euro (I’d still call for DNA testing, but that’s me).
Mundell says such admonitions are not in China’s interest and would bring about huge problems such as threatening its already wobbly banking system beset by bad loans, cause deflation, increase unemployment, reduce net foreign investment and cut economic growth.
“I think it might drop the growth rate from 10 percent down below 5 percent,” he said. “And that would get the growth rate down to those dangerous levels that they got in 1989 and 1990, the years of the great dissent connected with the Tiananmen Square problem.”
Mundell said China’s stunning growth has given it a much bigger role in Asia’s economy, which wouldn’t be able to escape the effects of ill-advised currency moves by authorities in Beijing.
“It would lower and destroy this process that’s been so important to all Asia, this kind of vertical integration of the Asian economy where the more advanced countries like Korea and Japan have been sending their products to China to be finished and re-exported to the United States,” he said.
The problem that our policy makers don’t see (and this is very far from a partisan issue) is that we may be forcing China to follow the same path as Japan. A higher yuan could cause a deflationary slump. Once started, those aren’t easy to stop.
Or there’s another question. How do we know that the yuan is too low? What if it’s not? Perhaps the reason why we have a massive trade deficit is—how can I put this—because we need to have a massive trade deficit. If not China, there’s always India. Also, it was because the yuan was tied to the dollar that helped stem the Asian financial crisis of the late-1990s.
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York said, “given the importance of this issue, we should approach it with a calm understanding of the facts and not resort to shameless grandstanding.” No, I’m kidding. He’s being a screaming moron. Schumer and Lindsey Graham have sponsored a bill that would impose a 27.5% on all Chinese goods. Why 27.5%? That’s what they claim the yuan is undervalued by.
As for me, I can’t say exactly why the yuan is where it is. But…there it is. And now we’re screwing around with its value for political reasons. There’s your Major Concern right there.
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 16th, 2006 at 7:05 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
Archives
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005