Take Alcoa Out of the Dow

Shares of Alcoa (AA) are up big today on news that the company may be the target of a takeover. The Times of London is reporting that Australia’s BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto are both considering bidding $40 billion for Alcoa.
Personally, I’d like to see this happen. Not so much for the shareholders. Although, they deserve some reward for suffering through Paul O’Neill for twelve years. No, I simply want to see Alcoa thrown out of the Dow. If the custodians of the index won’t do it, let’s have the market do it. I can’t remember the last time a Dow stock was bought out. But that’s my point right there. Shouldn’t the Dow stock be the one doing the buying?
Alcoa is currently the smallest stock in the Dow by market cap. (Except for GM, which — as far as I’m concerned — is no longer a stock, but an benefits management company that sells crappy cars on the side for below cost.)
Alcoa joined the Dow in 1959. Today, the company’s market cap is roughly 0.7% of the entire Dow. But since the index is weighted by price, not market value, shares of Alcoa really make up 2.2% of the index. Alcoa has a greater weighting in the Dow than Microsoft, even though the software giant has nearly ten times the market value. In fact, Microsoft’s bank account is worth $27 billion. They could nearly buy Alcoa without breaking a sweat.
This list shows all the changes to the Dow over the past 75 years.
If Alcoa goes away, expect to hear a lobby for Google (GOOG) to replace it, but my vote would be for Bank of America (BAC). That’s the largest S&P 500 stock not currently in the Dow. BAC is followed by Cisco (CSCO), then Chevron (CVX), then Google.
Here’s an interesting tidbit on the Dow. The editors of the Wall Street Journal changed the index in 1939 by tossing out IBM (IBM). They added it back in 1979. In those 40 years, IBM gained 22,000% If the editors had left the index alone, the Dow would now be about 35% higher than where it is.
All the historical benchmarks would be different. The Dow would have cracked 1,000 in 1961 instead of twelve years later. Behold the power of one really good stock.

Posted by on February 13th, 2007 at 1:38 pm


The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.