Archive for May, 2008

• New Book to Hate
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 20th, 2008 at 10:13 am

  Malcolm Gladwell is coming out with a new book. Here’s the blurb at Amazon:

  In this stunning new book, Malcolm Gladwell takes us on an intellectual journey through the world of “outliers”–the best and the brightest, the most famous and the most successful. He asks the question: what makes high-achievers different? His answer is that we pay too much attention to what successful people are like, and too little attention to where they are from: that is, their culture, their family, their generation, and the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing. Along the way he explains the secrets of software billionaires, what it takes to be a great soccer player, why Asians are good at math, and what made the Beatles the greatest rock band.
  Brilliant and entertaining, OUTLIERS is a landmark work that will simultaneously delight and illuminate.

  I shouldn’t say I hate the book before it comes out, I’m just a little skeptical of Gladwell’s approach to things. He’s a big fan of CONCEPTS and he has a tendency to see the application of his CONCEPTS everywhere. When in fact, these CONCEPTS really don’t have the ability to leap with ease into many different fields. What Gladwell really does is write intellectual fast food for the NPR set.
  (Hat Tip: Weisenthal)

• Just a Quick Observation
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 20th, 2008 at 10:11 am

  When did the NBA playoffs become the sports of equivalent of Stalingrad? With yesterday’s Spurs victory, the playoffs are now officially half over. But the final regular season game happened five weeks ago from tomorrow. We still have more than one month to go. What the hell takes them so long?
  The Spurs and Hornets played their sixth game on Thursday, then took off Friday, Saturday and Sunday, to play the seventh game on Monday. On top of that, the first round is almost completely unnecessary. All eight lower ranked teams won. In the second round, three of the four lower ranked teams won. The only exception was the Spurs beating the Hornets. Although the Hornets had the #2 seed, the teams had the same regular season record.
  Can’t we do away with at least one round? As a point of principle, I don’t think a team with a losing record should ever be allowed to make the playoffs.
  OK, rant over.

• Jay Leno on Cars
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 19th, 2008 at 8:52 pm

  First, Portfolio got Tom Wolfe to write in their inaugural issue. Now a bigger coup — Jay Leno writes about cars:

  The type of vehicles America makes best are, unfortunately, not the type of vehicles that people really want anymore. Nobody builds better trucks than the Americans do. Not even the Japanese build as good a truck as the Ford F-150 or the Chevy Silverado. It’s the same with performance cars. The Corvette Z06 has 505 horsepower, comes with a big warranty, and can hit 200 miles per hour. It weighs almost exactly the same as a half-million-dollar Porsche Carrera GT and gets higher mileage—26 miles per gallon.
  Where we seem to lose it is in the low-bucks econocar. I used to be able to identify any American car from 25 yards. Now they all have this jellybean look. It’s a mystery to me, because the one thing we used to do better than anybody else was build cheap, extremely high-quality cars. We did it for decades, all the way back to the beginning of the industry. There was no better car for the money than the Model T. It was a basic car, but it used the finest materials available. There are still almost a million of them out there.
  When you get into a high-priced, well-made American car today and the key is in the ignition, you hear a melodic bong, bong. But when you get in a cheap American car, like a rental, and the key is left in, it goes plink, plink, plink. It’s just horrible. Every time you use the turn signal, it’s like breaking a chicken leg. In order to make the more expensive car more appealing, U.S. companies feel as though they have to dumb down the cheaper car.

• The Market By Days of the Week
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 19th, 2008 at 5:21 pm

  Since 1950, the S&P 500 is down on the combined days of Monday, Tuesday and Thursday. All of the indexes gains have come on Wednesday and Friday (dividends not included).
  
  Here are the combined gains:
  Monday -86.43%
  Tuesday 125.23%
  Thursday 184.30%
  Friday 656.15%
  Wednesday 1,201.75%
  Since May 16, 1998 the breakdown is as follows:
  Friday -13.25%
  Tuesday -11.51%
  Monday 11.13%
  Thursday 13.41%
  Wednesday 32.87%
  This means that all of the net capital gains for the past 10 years have come on Wednesdays which is just 20% of the time (that’s 32.87% for Wednesday, -3.24% for the other four days combined).

• Banks Keep $35 Billion Markdown Off Income Statements
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 19th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

  From Bloomberg:

  Banks and securities firms, reeling from record losses resulting from the collapse of the mortgage securities market, are failing to acknowledge in their income statements at least $35 billion of additional writedowns included in their balance sheets, regulatory filings show.
  Citigroup Inc. subtracted $2 billion from equity for the declining value of home-loan bonds in its quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2 without mentioning the deduction in the earnings statement or conference call with investors that followed. ING Groep NV placed 3.6 billion euros ($5.6 billion) of negative valuations in its capital account, while disclosing only an 80 million-euro depletion to income.
  The balance-sheet adjustments are in addition to $344 billion of writedowns and credit losses already reported on the income statements of more than 100 banks. These companies have raised $263 billion from sovereign wealth funds, their own governments and public investors to shore up capital. The balance-sheet writedowns also reduce equity, which needs to be replenished. Adding the $35 billion leaves the banks with a $116 billion mountain of losses to climb.
  “The smart people are the ones who’ve identified the problems, put them out there in full transparency, and addressed them by raising more capital,” said Michael Holland, who oversees more than $4 billion as chairman of Holland & Co. in New York. “There is still billions of dollars of crap out there that hasn’t worked itself through the system. Banks need more capital to work that all out.”

• 10-Year P/E Ratios
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am

  
  The other day I wrote that the market’s P/E ratio reached a four-year high. Instead of viewing it as overpriced, I said that this is an instance where the market’s earnings multiple may not be a good valuation indicator. The reason is that stock prices are forward-looking and they’re reacting to a brighter outlook a few months from now, even though earnings are still declining. Higher prices and lower earnings translate to a higher multiple.
  In today’s Wall Street Journal, Mark Gongloff writes on higher multiples:

  Benjamin Graham and David Dodd, the Romulus and Remus of value investing, suggest weighing prices against earnings averaged over a period of as long as 10 years. On that basis, the S&P 500 today trades at roughly 28 times reported earnings. That’s lower than the peak of about 48 at the height of the dot-com bubble, but hardly a bargain; for the past 60 years, that P/E ratio has averaged about 21.

  I need to add a few points. Remember that the Price/Earnings Ratio contains one major flaw. It compares two different sets of data. The price is a fixed-point number. You always know what it is at a given point in time. Earnings is a rate. That is, it can only be known between two fixed points in time.
  Now I need to stress this point because it’s often misunderstood. Just because price and earnings are different types of data doesn’t mean that it’s worthless to compare them. You can absolutely compare different data points, but you need to realize the limitations. (One recent commenter on my comparison of the Dow and S&P 500 said that the whole thing is worthless because one is market-weighted and the other is price-weighted. That’s incorrect. It’s certainly worthwhile to compare them, but it’s what kinds of comparisons you can draw that’s important.)
  The other thing about the P/E ratio is that it’s almost useless in timing the market, but it’s very useful in making judgments about what stocks to buy and sell. If I have a chance, I’ll post more evidence on this point later.
  The last point is that I never understood the importance of looking at 10 years’ worth of earnings. Graham and Dodd used that metric but it doesn’t seem very useful to me. Note this recent chart I posted looking at trailing earnings and the S&P 500. What can I say, the relationship seems pretty strong to me. Why would I want to bring in data from 1998? When analyzing market data, the question to ask is how useful is this data? Not, is the data perfect?

• Turning Point in the Presidential Election Cycle
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 19th, 2008 at 10:13 am

  I don’t place a great deal of faith in these indicators, but we’re nearing a traditional low point in the Presidential Election Cycle.
  On average, the Dow is fairly weak from the September 6 of a pre-election year to May 28 of the election. Over that time, the Dow averages a loss of -5.2%. That may not sound like a lot but it’s an average of the entire Dow from 1896 to 2007.
  After May 28, the Dow gains an average of 15.2% by the end of the year.
  

• S&P 500 at 19-Week High
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 16th, 2008 at 10:29 am

  Yesterday, the S&P 500 closed at 1423.57. That’s the highest close since January 3. It’s also 11.8% above the lowest close of the year, which came on March 10.
  
  Also, has anyone noticed that Nicholas Financial (NICK) is above $7 a share?
  With yesterday’s close, the S&P 500’s P/E ratio is at 18.3. That’s the highest level in four years. One small caveat. The P/E ratio often bumps up when the market is a good buy because the earnings are backwards-looking and prices are forward-looking. Trailing earnings are still heading down, but stock prices are up sharply, hence a higher earnings multiple.
  

• The Buy List Year to Date
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 15th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

  
  Through yesterday, the Crossing Wall Street Buy List is down -5.96% YTD. The S&P 500 is down -4.07%. That doesn’t include dividends. The volatility of the Buy List is about 4% greater than the S&P 500.

• Tim Brown — Stock Analyst
  Eddy Elfenbein, May 15th, 2008 at 12:35 pm

  
  Former Heisman Trophy winner, Tim Brown, is now (like me), a columnist at TheStreet.com. (Editors note, for clarification, I’ve never won the Heisman.) Here’s a sample from Tim’s debut column:

  I am starting with the best of the best: Microsoft. Not only is this a world-class company, it is a steal at this price. It closed at $29.39 on Friday and is much closer to its 52-week low ($26.87) than it is to its high ($37.50).
  The idea behind my picks is just like my approach on the field: find a weakness and exploit it. On the football field, I would look for any advantage I could get on the opposing cornerback. In this case, the weakness is not with the company, but rather with Wall Street’s valuation of the company. The Street has unfairly picked on Microsoft, and we will pounce on this opportunity. Not long ago, Microsoft was trading at approximately $35.00.