CWS Market Review – February 13, 2015
“Reversion to the mean is the iron rule of financial markets.” – Jack Bogle
Jack’s right. Not only do markets revert to the mean, but sometimes that reversion can be quite mean. By now, you’ve probably gathered that I’m not much of a fan of market forecasts. People often ask me where I think the market will be in six or twelve months. My answer: “beats me!”
The past few days are a great example of why it’s so hard to predict the market. Not only is it impossible, but it’s unnecessary as well. Just a few days ago, everyone seemed so down on the S&P 500. On February 2, the S&P 500 reached an intra-day low of 1,980.90; that’s 5.4% below the all-time intra-day high reached five weeks before. But since then, the market has rebounded impressively. On Thursday, the S&P 500 reached its highest close this year. (Maybe the market was rooting for the Patriots?)
In this week’s CWS Market Review, we’ll take a closer look at the market’s recent uptick. Our Buy List stocks continue to do well. Qualcomm ($QCOM) finally reached a deal with the Chinese government. It’s not every day you agree to fork over $1 billion and your stock shoots up. I suppose investors expect the worst when dealing with the PRC. I’ll also preview two more Buy List earnings reports coming next week, Wabtec ($WAB) and Hormel Foods ($HRL). But first, let’s take a look at the market’s recent rally.
The S&P 500 May Be at an All-Time Inflation-Adjusted High
On Thursday, the S&P 500 ended at 2,088.48 for its highest close this year. The index may have closed at an all-time inflation-adjusted high. That hasn’t happened in nearly 15 years. The only problem is, we can’t say for sure until the CPI for February comes out in about five weeks.
Here’s how it works. The S&P 500 made its all-time inflation-adjusted high on March 23, 2000. The index closed that day at 1,527.35. That’s actually one day before the market peaked, but the one-day gain was less than the rate of inflation. Going by the recent CPI data, which is for December, the close from March 23, 2000 works out to 2,099.30 in today’s dollars.
Here’s the catch: The CPI has been falling lately thanks to lower oil. As a result, the all-time inflation-adjusted high has been falling as well. The S&P 500 closed 0.52% below its inflation-adjusted high. So the question is, have prices deflated that much this year? I don’t know. But the lesson for investors is that the market can go a long time without making any real gains. Another lesson is the importance of dividends. Once we include dividends, the S&P 500 is well above its 2000 peak, with or without inflation.
I’m also happy to say that our Buy List has been doing very well lately. Our Buy List beat the S&P 500 for eight days in a row, and it came close to making nine days on Thursday. Thanks to some strong earnings reports, our Buy List is up 6.99% so far this month compared with 4.69% for the S&P 500. That’s a pretty big gap for such a short time period.
I should point out how conservative our Buy List truly is. Last year, the daily changes of our Buy List correlated more than 93% with the daily changes of the S&P 500. It will probably be about the same this year. Many active managers would try very hard to avoid such a high correlation with the overall market. After all, they want to show how they stand apart from everyone else. For me, I don’t mind following the market so closely. I know that over time, the superior characteristics of our strategy will come forward, and that’s happened many times over the last ten years.
Qualcomm Settles With the PRC
Qualcomm ($QCOM) has been our leading candidate for Dud of the Earnings Season. Even in top-notch portfolios, there’s always going to be one. Actually, Qualcomm’s earnings were quite good. The company pulled in $1.34 per share for Q4. That beat estimates by nine cents per share.
The problem was Qualcomm’s guidance. Before, the company said to expect full-year earnings of $5.35 per share. In the earnings report, they said they’ll range between $4.75 and $5.05 per share. As you might imagine, Wall Street was not pleased. The stock dropped 10% in one day.
This week, Qualcomm announced that they’d reached a deal with the Chinese government. The company will pay a fine of $975 million due to their “anti-competitive practices.” If I were the cynical type, I’d mention the irony of this charge coming from a one-party state. Since I’m not, I won’t. The fine works out to about 60 cents per share. The deal also calls for Qualcomm to lower the royalty rate they get on their patents.
The good news from this deal is that it doesn’t alter Qualcomm’s business model. A lot of people were expecting much worse. The company gets about half of its revenue from China. Qualcomm actually raised the lower end of its guidance by ten cents per share. Excluding the fine, Qualcomm now expects earnings to range between $4.85 and $5.05 per share.
This is very good news for Qualcomm. They really dodged a bullet. I think some other countries may try to pile on like South Korea, but China is the biggie. From the low on February 2 to the high on February 11, Qualcomm rallied 14%. After the earnings report, I cut my Buy Below to $66 per share. As is often the case with investing, doing nothing probably would have been a better move. In any event, I’m going to raise our Buy Below on Qualcomm to $72 per share.
I faced a similar situation with Ford Motor ($F). Since October, I’ve had my Buy Below for Ford at $17 per share, and I resisted lowering it for as long as I could. The stock reacted poorly in January to what I thought was a fine earnings report so I relented and lowered my Buy Below to $16 per share.
Sure enough, a strong sales report sparked a rally. I don’t know if that’s reversion to the mean, or if it was simply people realizing that this stock recently raised its dividend by 20% and now yields 3.7%. Ford is also sticking by its forecast of $8.5 billion to $9.5 billion in pretax profit this year. This week, I’m raising my Buy Below on Ford to $17 per share.
By the way, if you’re looking to add new money to the market, some of our tech stocks are looking very attractive right now. Our four worst-performing stocks so far this year are all tech stocks; Microsoft, eBay, Oracle and Qualcomm. The weakness in overseas economies is taking a toll on these stocks. I’ve already discussed Qualcomm, but I think the other three are going for very good prices at the moment.
For example, Microsoft ($MSFT) is trading at 14.7 times next fiscal year’s earnings. Let’s remember that this is one of very few AAA-rated stocks. A lot of companies can’t say that. Actually, a lot of countries can’t say that. Microsoft just floated a huge bond deal this week, which included 40-year paper. That coupon is just 4%. Microsoft is also sitting on $90 billion in cash, and over 90% of that is outside the United States. It looks like Congress is getting serious about a deal that would allow companies to bring that money home at a reduced rate. The stock has recently dropped which broke a long uptrend (see below). Microsoft is a good buy up to $45 per share.
The situation at Oracle ($ORCL) isn’t quite as rosy. The company had missed earnings for four straight quarters. They finally delivered an earnings beat in December, and the stock shot up, but it’s been pretty lackluster ever since. The good news for Oracle is that they’ve been catching up with their cloud business. The company reports earnings again next month, and I want to see more confirmation of their progress before I say it’s a very attractive buy. For now, Oracle remains a decent buy up to $48 per share.
Upcoming Buy List Earnings Reports
We still have a few more earnings reports to go for Q4 earnings season. I have to explain that companies sometimes take a little longer to report their Q4 earnings. The SEC grants a little extra time for companies to report their fiscal Q4 than with the other three quarters. As a result, some of the later Q4 earnings reports tend to overlap with the earnings reports of companies who end their quarters in January. Next week, two of our new Buy List stocks report earnings, Hormel Foods and Wabtec. But Wabtec’s quarter ended in December, while Hormel’s ended in January. The same thing will happen the week after when Express Scripts (December) and Ross Stores (January) are due to report.
Wabtec ($WAB) is due to report on Wednesday, February 18. This is a very strong company. Wabtec is the only stock on any U.S. exchange that’s risen in each of the last 13 years. If you’re not familiar with WAB, they make locomotives, brakes and other parts for the freight- and passenger-rail industries. In October, Wabtec raised its Q4 guidance to 91 to 95 cents per share. Look for good more good results. I rate Wabtec a buy up to $90 per share.
Hormel Foods ($HRL), the Spam company, is due to report earnings on Thursday, February 19. It was just reported that Hormel is close to a deal to buy Applegate Farms, a privately held firm that makes organic products. The deal could be between $600 million and $1 billion.
For Q4 earnings, Wall Street expects earnings of 64 cents per share. In December, Hormel said to expect full-year earnings to range between $2.45 and $2.55 per share (their fiscal year ends in October). Also in December, Hormel raised their dividend by 25%. It was their 49th consecutive annual dividend increase. Not bad for lunch meat. Hormel is a buy up to $56 per share.
That’s all for now. The stock market will be closed on Monday for George Washington’s Birthday. The NYSE makes it very clear that officially, the holiday is not President’s Day but Washington’s Birthday. Next Wednesday will be an important day. We’ll get key reports on industrial production and capacity utilization. The Federal Reserve will also release the minutes of their last meeting. It will be interesting to hear more details on the Fed’s thinking. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
– Eddy
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 13th, 2015 at 7:08 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005