Archive for November, 2015
-
Hormel Foods Earns 74 Cents per Share
Eddy Elfenbein, November 24th, 2015 at 9:07 amGood news for Hormel Foods (HRL). The spam company just reported fiscal Q4 earnings of 74 cents per share. That topped expectations by five cents per share. This is a solid report from Hormel.
“I am proud of the excellent fourth quarter delivered by our team, achieving record earnings for the tenth straight quarter. We reported record bottom line results for the full year, with fiscal 2015 adjusted net earnings up 19 percent over last year and all five segments registering earnings growth,” said Jeffrey M. Ettinger, chairman of the board and chief executive officer.
For the year, Hormel earned $2.64 per share which topped their announced range of $2.57 to $2.63 per share. That’s a 19% increase over last year.
For 2016, Hormel projects a range of $2.85 to $2.95 per share. That’s above Wall Street’s consensus of $2.83 per share.
Best of all, the spam company also raised their quarterly dividend by 16% to 29 cents per share. That comes to $1.16 per share for the year. This is Hormel’s 50th-straight annual dividend increase. Based on yesterday’s close, HRL yields 1.7%.
The stock gapped as high as $71.71 per share which is a new 52-week high. Check out the 25-year chart on Hormel.
-
Morning News: November 24, 2015
Eddy Elfenbein, November 24th, 2015 at 7:13 amGerman Business Confidence Rises in Sign of Robust Economy
Nestlé Reports on Abuses in Thailand’s Seafood Industry
In Taking Economic War to Islamic State, U.S. Developing New Tools
Oil Advances as Mideast Tensions Rise After Russian Plane Downed
Low Oil, Gas Investment to Have Long-Term Impact on Supply, IEA Chief Says
Yellen Defends Seven Years of Low Interest Rates in Letter to Nader
Pfizer Weighs Splitting Up New Drug Behemoth
Apple Seems to Launch Apple Pay in China by February
Microsemi to Buy PMC-Sierra In Deal Valued at About $2.5 Billion
Skyworks Scraps Deal for PMC After Microsemi’s Increased Bid
Elliott Confirms Alcoa Stake, Supports Plans to Split Company
Allianz Exiting Coal Stocks on Climate Change, CIO Tells ZDF
Cullen Roche: The Budget Deficit is (Mostly) Endogenous
Roger Nusbaum: Strongest Week of the Year?
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: November 23, 2015
Eddy Elfenbein, November 23rd, 2015 at 7:08 amMasters of the Finance Universe Are Worried About China
Cut Oil Supply or Drop Riyal Peg? Saudis Face ‘Critical’ Choice
Commodities Clobbered as Dollar Bulldozes Higher
Creditors Signal Potential Support for Overhauling Puerto Rico Debt
The Fed’s Inflation Expectations Game
Pfizer, Allergan Agree on Historic Merger Deal
Wal-Mart Pulls Cyber Monday Forward to Sunday, Record Industry Sales Expected
Chrysler Expands Free Tuition Program to Include Employees’ Families
Alibaba’s Jack Ma Said to Be in Discussions to Buy SCMP Stake
Pearson’s Big Paydays Defy the Odds Against Print Media
Petco Nears $4.7 Billion Sale to CVC and Canadian Pension Plan
Avago Secures Unconditional EU Approval For $37 Billion Broadcom Buy
Procter & Gamble: Time for a Split – Barron’s
What’s in a Corporate Turnaround Plan Name?
Jeff Miller: What Are The Best Year-End Investments?
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Investors Revolt at Towers Watson
Eddy Elfenbein, November 20th, 2015 at 1:27 pmOne of my frustrations with modern finance is the way shareholders have been pushed to the side. The job of the board of directors is to serve their interests but you wouldn’t know that by looking at a lot of deals. That’s why I was glad to see the recent shareholder revolt at Towers Watson (TW).
In June, Willis Group holdings said it would merge with TW. The combined entity would be worth $18 billion. But it was a terrible deal for TW shareholders. When you added up the cash and shares, TW shareholders would actually be getting a 9% discount for their shares. The whole point of a merger is to pay a premium.
Shareholders struck back and this week, they voted down the deal. Good for them. TW has been an impressive company over the past few years. Now Willis and TW have sweetened the deal, but not by much. I hope this new offer gets shot down as well.
-
CWS Market Review – November 20, 2015
Eddy Elfenbein, November 20th, 2015 at 7:08 am“Stock market: a place where events with a <1% probability are discussed >90% of the time.” – Urban Carmel
“Wall Street hates uncertainty”: so goes the old saying. Until recently, investors feared an interest-rate hike. Now that a December rate hike seems quite probable, investors may fear that it won’t happen.
After the awful events in Paris, there was some concern that the Federal Reserve could delay an interest-rate hike. Now that some time has passed, that doesn’t appear to be the case. This week, the Fed released the minutes of its last meeting, and all the signs are in place for a rate hike. We also got an inflation report this week which suggests that deflation has run its course.
According to the latest futures prices, there’s a 71.7% chance that the Fed will raise interest rates at its December meeting. We’ve had false alarms before, but the Fed seems quite serious this time. This would be the Fed’s first interest-rate hike in nearly a decade. The financial world is finally getting back to normal.
In this week’s CWS Market Review, we’ll take a closer look at the recent economic data. Corporate earnings pulled back again during Q3, but there are signs of improvement for Q4. Initial jobless claims have been under 300,000 for the last 39 weeks in a row. That’s the longest streak in more than 40 years.
We just had a nice earnings report from Ross Stores (ROST). The deep discounter had given us tepid guidance, so it’s good to see it beat expectations. Later on, I’ll preview next week’s earnings report from Hormel Foods (HRL). The Spam company just hit a new high—it’s a 32.1% YTD winner for us. I’m also expecting Hormel to raise its dividend next week, which would be its 50th straight annual dividend increase. I’ll also update some of our Buy List stocks. But first, let’s take a closer look at the economy and stock market at the midway point of Q4.
The Global Economy Is out of Sync
We’re heading into the final stretch of the calendar, and in recent years, that’s been a good time for stocks. The S&P 500 has been positive over the final 30 trading days of the year for the last 12 years. Santa is clearly a bull.
What’s interesting is that over the last month, the stock market has developed an unusual pattern. Each day, the market either falls or it rises by a lot. There haven’t been many modestly positive days.
Here are the numbers: In the last 23 trading sessions, the S&P 500 has fallen 15 times and rallied eight tines. But of those eight positive days, six have been greater than 1.1%. Just two of the last 23 days have seen either a loss less than 0.1% or a gain less than 1.1%. In other words, there’s no more middle ground. To borrow from Yeats, “Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; mean reversion is loosed upon the world.”
What does this mean? Hard to say, but I suspect that the market now assumes each day to be a negative until it’s proven bullish. Obviously, the Paris attack rattled nerves, especially in European markets, but that’s past us, and terrorism’s track record of disrupting financial markets has been a big fat zero. On Wednesday, the S&P 500 rallied over its 200-day moving average, and the French market is positive for the week.
So what’s the economic outlook for the U.S.? On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve released the minutes from its October meeting. I’m afraid these minutes always make for pretty dry reading, even for academics. Yet one part stood out. After the Fed laid out what would have to happen for rates to go higher, “most participants anticipated that…these conditions could well be met by the time of the next meeting.”
Whoa, that’s a big deal. I have to explain that the Fed’s minutes are a case study in the use of indefinite pronouns (“some” said this, “many” said that, “others” felt this). So when they say “most,” they mean it.
Pardon me for a brief nerdy digression, but the Fed is in the midst of a very wonky debate over the “natural interest rate.” This refers to the rate at which everything comes into balance. So when the Fed goes below the natural rate, it’s stepping on the gas. When it goes above it, it’s stepping on the brakes.
But here’s the tricky thing about the natural rate—no one knows what it is. In fact, there are some economists who think the whole idea is bogus. So the idea is that there’s this weird conceptual interest rate that’s floating around somewhere out in the ether, yet we can’t see it or hear it. But it drives everything. And here’s where it gets truly weird: the natural rate has likely gone down. Way down. The staff at the Fed thinks the natural rate went negative during the financial crisis, and it’s probably hanging just above 0% right now. (If you’re curious, here’s a post I did last year about the natural rate and gold.)
I think that’s right. It probably explains why gold and silver have taken such a beating even though rates are still so low. If your currency’s interest rate is above the natural rate, then, all things being equal, commodities will fall. Silver just snapped its 15-day losing streak. U.S. crude inventories are the highest they’ve been at this time of year since 1930.
Fortunately for the Fed, the vagaries of the natural rate aren’t quite so vital at the moment, but it’s a very big deal to Mr. Draghi and his friends at the ECB. Bond yields in Europe are getting absurdly low. Germany just sold off some two-year bonds at -0.38%. In other words, investors are paying the government to borrow money from them. Stay tuned. I think the ECB will take further steps to get the European economy back on its feet. The euro may soon reach parity against the dollar.
Here’s what investors need to understand: the driving force in world economics at the moment is that the U.S. and the rest of the world are out of sync. We’re heating up while they’re still trying to get started. That’s what’s been driving the dollar higher.
On Tuesday, the U.S. government reported that inflation rose by 0.2% last month. That may not sound like much, but in seasonally adjusted terms, it was the most inflation since June. The “core rate,” which excludes food and energy, rose by 0.2%. In the last year, the core rate is up by 1.9%. Officially, the Fed’s inflation target is 2%. The sudden deflation that we saw late last year clearly made the Fed rethink any rate-hike plans. That’s no longer an issue. The next test for the Fed will be the November jobs report which comes out on December 4. Now let’s take a look at our Buy List earnings report from this week.
Ross Stores Earns 53 Cents per Share
Last week, I told you that I was a bit puzzled by the weak guidance from Ross Stores (ROST). The numbers they gave us simply didn’t add up. Were they low-balling us (as they like to do), or are they seeing real problems ahead?
We’ve also seen a lot of weakness across the retail sector. Macy’s (M), for example, got clobbered after a lousy report. Last week, the Census Bureau said that retail sales were sluggish in October.
In August, Ross said they saw Q3 coming in between 48 and 50 cents per share. After the closing bell on Thursday, they reported Q3 results of 53 cents per share. So maybe they were being extra conservative.
Ross said that Q3 sales rose 7% to 2.783 billion. The key metric, comp-store sales, rose 3%. They had been expecting a gain of 1% to 2%.
Last week, I told you I expected Ross to raise their estimates for Q4. No such luck.
Looking ahead, Ms. Rentler said, “In the upcoming fourth quarter, we face challenging prior-year comparisons, ongoing uncertainty in the macro-economic environment, and a holiday season that will be highly promotional. Therefore, while we hope to do better, we believe it is prudent to maintain our prior guidance for this period. For the 13 weeks ending January 30, 2016, we continue to project same-store sales to be flat to up 1%, versus a strong 6% gain in the prior year, with earnings per share of $.60 to $.63 compared to $.60 in last year’s fourth quarter. For fiscal 2015, earnings per share are now forecast to be in the range of $2.45 to $2.48, up 11% to 12% from $2.21 in fiscal 2014.”
The shares rose about 6% in after-hours trading. Ross Stores remains a good buy whenever you see it below $54 per share.
Expect a 50th-Straight Dividend Increase from Hormel
Hormel Foods (HRL) has been one of the best new additions to this year’s Buy List. On Thursday, the shares hit another 52-week high. We now have a 32.1% gain in Hormel, making it our second-best performer YTD.
The Spam company is due to report its fiscal Q4 earnings on Tuesday, November 24. For Q3, the company beat earnings and raised guidance for the full year. That was actually the second time it had raised their guidance. Hormel now sees full-year earnings coming in between $2.57 and $2.63 per share. That implies earnings growth of 15% to 18% over 2014, which itself was a record year.
But what I’m really looking forward to is the dividend announcement. Hormel usually raises its dividend with its Q4 earnings report. The company has increased its dividend for the last 49 years in a row, and the healthy profit increase tells us to expect #50 on Tuesday.
Hormel currently pays out 25 cents per share each quarter or $1 per share for the whole year. I think it can easily be bumped up to 29 or 30 cents per share. Hormel Foods is a very solid company.
Buy List Updates
On Thursday, shares of AFLAC (AFL) touched a new 52-week high. The stock got as high as $65.42. You may recall how hard the stock was hit during August. But the worriers were wrong. Last month, the duck stock not only beat earnings but gave investors their 33rd dividend increase in a row. AFLAC remains a good buy up to $67 per share.
Shares of Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) got caught up in the retail storm. The stock finished Thursday below $54 per share which seems quite cheap to me. Let’s look at the numbers. Last fiscal year (ending in February), the home-furnishings store made $5.03 per share. They said they expect to increase that by 0% to 5% this year. At the halfway mark, EPS is up 2.1%. Note that a lot of that is driven by share buybacks. I’m lowering our Buy Below on BBBY to $58 per share.
This week, Fiserv (FISV) announced a 15 million-share repurchase program. That’s about 7% of the company’s outstanding shares. All things being equal, I’d rather have the company pay shareholders in dividends, but this announcement is a reflection of how strong Fiserv is. Last month, the company beat earnings and raised guidance. Fiserv expects full-year earnings of $3.84 to $3.87 per share. This is another very good stock.
Every time I think the news can’t get worse for Qualcomm (QCOM), the news gets worse for Qualcomm. This week, the company said the South Korean government is investigating it for anti-trust violations. The stock dropped 9.4% and hit a four-year low. Qualcomm denies any charges, but I doubt that will get it far, especially in a country where Samsung, one of its top competitors, is based. I think we’ll soon hear more news about Qualcomm breaking itself up.
That’s all for now. Next week is Thanksgiving, so there will be no issue of CWS Market Review. The stock market will be closed next Thursday for Thanksgiving. The market will close at 1 pm on Friday. This is usually the slowest trading day of the year. There’s not much reason for the market to be open, but the NYSE hates to have the exchange closed for four days in a row. The only interesting economic report will come on Tuesday when we get the first revision to Q3 GDP. The initial report said that the economy grew by 1.5% for Q3. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
– Eddy
-
Morning News: November 20, 2015
Eddy Elfenbein, November 20th, 2015 at 6:28 amECB Minutes Signal More Stimulus Possible in December
China Cracks $64 Billion `Underground Bank’ Moving Money Abroad
Economic Fallout of Paris Attacks Hits Hotels Hard
Oil Crash Means Biggest Boomers Halt Supply Growth in 2016
This Is Why The Fed Has Waited To Hike, Says Ken Griffin
Biggest Insurer Threatens to Abandon Health Law
Shares of Square Soar by 45% After Public Offering
Here’s Why Shkreli Is Going To Have His Hands Full Trying To Save KaloBios
ABN Amro Valued at $17.9 Billion in IPO
The Last Days Of Marissa Mayer?
Volkswagen Faces Pressure in U.S. to Buy Back Older Diesel Cars
14 Predictions for 2016 from the Brightest Minds in Finance
Jeff Carter: The Future of Work
Cullen Roche: Three Things I Think I Think – Illiteracy Edition
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: November 19, 2015
Eddy Elfenbein, November 19th, 2015 at 6:11 amBOJ Keeps Policy Steady Despite Recession, Sees Capex Rebound
No One Can Afford to Take on Slim for $13 Billion Mexico Airport
Why U.S. Efforts to Cut Off Islamic State’s Funds Have Failed
Soothing Fed Sounds Send Shares, Emerging Markets Higher
Square and Match Debut in the Shadow of Sputtering IPOs
Starboard Urges Yahoo to Drop Alibaba Spinoff Plan
Pfizer Said Near Agreement to Buy Allergan in Biggest Deal
Why Alibaba’s Shopping Spree Makes Sense
Target’s Apparel, Online Sales Come Under Added Pressure
Results of U.A.W. Vote Show Ford Pact Losing
AB InBev Stock Rally Complicates Deal for SABMiller Holders
As Biggest Hedge Funds Stumble, One Currency Manager Gains 21%
With TV Viewing Changing, Networks Take Longer to Drop Shows
Joshua Brown: Five Things Smart Beta Can’t Do For You
Howard Lindzon: The State of the Markets…’Bricks and Mortar’ or ‘Bricks and Morbid’…and the Banks!
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Our Buy List Through November 18
Eddy Elfenbein, November 18th, 2015 at 5:43 pmThrough today’s trading, our Buy List is up 4.09% for the year while the S&P 500 is up 1.20%. Those numbers don’t include dividends but I will calculate those in our final performance numbers. Very roughly, dividends will add about 2% to the full-year return for the S&P 500, and about 1% for our Buy List.
I’m pleased that our Buy List is beating the market this year, but I wanted to point out that our lead has eroded since the summer. On August 20, our Buy List was up 5.21% on the year while the S&P 500 was down by 1.13%.
Since August 20, the S&P 500 is up 2.35% while we’re down 1.07%. Again, sans dividends. That’s hardly earth-shattering underperformance, but I always want to present the complete picture of our performance.
So what’s been dragging us down? It’s pretty easy to identify because four stocks stand out. Since August 20, Bed Bath & Beyond is down 13.84%, Ross Stores is off by 15.98%, Wabtec is down 19.76% and Qualcomm is down 20.20%. Ouch! Outside those four, the rest of the portfolio has been doing well.
I’m confident that we’ll beat the market again this year, but we’ve lagged a bit over the last three months.
-
The Fed Minutes Are Out
Eddy Elfenbein, November 18th, 2015 at 2:52 pmThe Fed just released the minutes from their October meeting. Here’s the important part:
During their discussion of economic conditions and monetary policy, participants focused on a number of issues associated with the timing and pace of policy normalization. Some participants thought that the conditions for beginning the policy normalization process had already been met. Most participants anticipated that, based on their assessment of the current economic situation and their outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation, these conditions could well be met by the time of the next meeting. Nonetheless, they emphasized that the actual decision would depend on the implications for the medium-term economic outlook of the data received over the upcoming intermeeting period. Some others, however, judged it unlikely that the information available by the December meeting would warrant raising the target range for the federal funds rate at that meeting.
A number of participants pointed to various reasons why the Committee should avoid a delay in policy firming. One concern was that such a delay, if the reasons were not well understood by market participants, could increase uncertainty in financial markets and unduly magnify the perceived importance of the beginning of the policy normalization process (I’m sorry but that’s just silly – Eddy). Another concern mentioned was the increasing risk of a buildup of financial imbalances after a prolonged period of very low interest rates. It was also noted that a decision to defer policy firming could be interpreted as signaling lack of confidence in the strength of the U.S. economy or erode the Committee’s credibility (Oh, please – Eddy). Some participants emphasized that progress toward the Committee’s objectives should be assessed in light of the cumulative gains made to date without placing excessive weight on month-to-month changes in incoming data.
Several participants indicated that, despite lessening concerns about the implications of recent global economic and financial developments for domestic economic activity and inflation, appreciable downside risks to the outlook remained. They were concerned about a potential loss of momentum in the economy and the associated possibility that inflation might fail to increase as expected. Such concerns might suggest that the initiation of the normalization process may not yet be warranted. They also noted uncertainty about whether economic growth was robust enough to withstand potential adverse shocks, given the limited ability of monetary policy to offset such shocks when the federal funds rate is near its effective lower bound, and concern that the beginning of policy normalization might be associated with an unwarranted tightening of financial conditions. They believed that in these circumstances, risk-management considerations called for a cautious approach. They judged it appropriate to wait for additional information providing evidence of further improvement in the labor market and increasing their confidence that inflation was on a path to return to 2 percent over the medium term before raising the target range for the federal funds rate. In addition, a couple of participants cited concerns that a premature tightening might damage the credibility of the Committee’s inflation objective if inflation stayed below 2 percent for a prolonged period.
Several participants indicated that, in the current low interest rate environment, it would be prudent for the Committee to consider options for providing additional monetary policy accommodation if the outlook for economic activity were to weaken to a degree that seemed likely to undermine continued progress in labor market conditions and impede the movement of inflation back to the Committee’s 2 percent objective over the medium term. It was also noted that the Committee would need to reformulate its communications regarding the near-term outlook for monetary policy if the economic outlook weakened significantly.
During their discussion of the likely path for the federal funds rate after the time of the first increase in the target range, participants generally agreed that it would probably be appropriate to remove policy accommodation gradually. Participants also indicated that the expected path of policy, rather than the timing of the initial increase, would be the more important influence on financial conditions and thus on the outlook for the economy and inflation, and they noted the importance of underscoring this view at the time of liftoff. It was noted that beginning the normalization process relatively soon would make it more likely that the policy trajectory after liftoff could be shallow. It was also emphasized that, while participants’ most recent economic projections suggested that a gradual increase in the target range for the federal funds rate will likely be appropriate to support progress toward the Committee’s dual objectives, monetary policy adjustments ultimately would be dependent on economic and financial developments. These adjustments thus could be either more or less gradual than the Committee currently anticipates, responding to the Committee’s assessment of the implications of incoming information for the medium-run outlook.
-
South Korea Looks to Fine Qualcomm
Eddy Elfenbein, November 18th, 2015 at 1:01 pmYes, there’s even more bad news for Qualcomm (QCOM). More anti-trust issues. This time from South Korea:
Qualcomm Inc. said the staff of South Korea’s antitrust agency has alleged that some of the U.S. chip maker’s patent-licensing practices are illegal and recommended that the company be fined.
The company, which has battled antitrust cases in multiple countries, said a case examiner’s report generated by the staff of the Korea Fair Trade Commission, known as the KFTC, also recommended modifications to its business practices. A Qualcomm spokeswoman said the company hasn’t been informed of the size of any potential fine
The shares, which were already down 29% going into today, are down another 8.5% today. What a mess!
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005