Posts Tagged ‘goog’
-
Is Google a Value Stock?
Eddy Elfenbein, May 10th, 2012 at 10:24 amDespite all the attention it gets, Google’s stock hasn’t been such a great performer over the past few years. Since its high point in 2007, the shares have mostly tracked the market.
What’s surprising to me is that the stock seems fairly inexpensive compared to the rest of the market. Consider this: Google is now trading at 12.06 times next year’s earnings estimate. By contrast, the S&P 500 is going for 11.34 times its earnings.
Given its strong growth, I would think Google would be going for a lot more than the rest of the market.
-
Don’t Invest From 40,000 Feet
Eddy Elfenbein, April 19th, 2012 at 9:49 amI read a lot of investment advice on and off the web. One of the mistakes I often see is that investors try to invest from 40,000 feet above their targets. By this, I mean they pay far too much attention to things like politics, seasonal effects or the Federal Reserve.
I hear people say things like, “I want to hold off investing right now until I see how the election turns out.” I’m never sure what that means exactly. Or they say, “I’d never investment now, not with Helicopter Ben in charge!”
I realize this sounds like heresy, but the Fed’s role in the movement of stocks is far, far over-rated. What’s more important is earnings and (to a lesser extent) valuations.
Look at McDonald’s ($MCD). The stock has done very well over the last ten years because its profits have done well. Yahoo‘s ($YHOO) profits haven’t well and the stock has suffered. Sure, there are exceptions, but those are the minority. Valuations, of course, do matter. Overall profits have increased while the market has done poorly.
Don’t mistake what I’m saying: Monetary policy is important, but even if you knew exactly what the Fed was going to do, that should barely impact your investments. Most investors would be much better off if they ignored all the news about the Fed or politics. People need to believe that someone is in control of the market, and that someone must be in Washington. I hate to break it to you, but they’re not running the market.
I also hear people say that sure, the market is up over the last three years, but that’s only because it’s been boosted by the Fed. They often say this as if the profits somehow don’t count. Don’t look for confirmation of your political views in the stock market (this is known as the “Larry Kudlow Effect”).
Since the beginning of 2009, Lowe’s ($LOW) is up about 40% while Home Depot ($HD) is up about 110%. Investors would do themselves a lot more good thinking about how two companies that are so similar can perform so differently or why Starbucks ($SBUX) went from $40 to $10 and is now over $60. What happened there? Google ($GOOG) gets tons of attention but its stock hasn’t outperformed the market over the past few years. Danaher ($DHR) gets almost no attention yet the stock keeps powering higher (even this morning, the AP calls the company a “health care conglomerate“). I don’t think that’s due to Ben Bernanke.
Ignore the large-scale stuff—anything where it’s easy to have a canned opinion (Obama, Bernanke, Romney). Instead, focus on low level things like one particular company’s sales, earnings and debt.
-
Blast from the Past: Credit Suisse Analyst Raises Price Target on Google to $900
Eddy Elfenbein, February 9th, 2012 at 12:02 pmCredit Suisse Internet analyst Heath Terry this morning raised his price target for Google (GOOG) to $900, from $800, in what he describes as an “attempt to better account for long-term opportunities in areas like display, local and mobile.”
Terry contends that “as all advertising goes digital, including television, radio and outdoor, and Google becomes the de facto operating system for advertisers, providing them with the dashboard to monitor and optimize their advertising, tremendous value will be created for Google shareholders.”
He sees the advertising opportunity driving top line growth of 35% or more, and profit growth of at least 30%, over the next five years.
Terry upped his 2008 EPS estimate to $18.93 from $18.75.
He also says that the company eventually will get “effectively” 100% of the Internet search market. He expects ongoing share gains to provide 38% growth in its search business over the next five years.
Google today is up $25.60, or 4%, to $651.45.
-
Google Smashes Earnings
Eddy Elfenbein, October 14th, 2011 at 11:26 amAfter the close yesterday, Google ($GOOG) reported very strong third-quarter earnings. The company earned $9.72 per share which was 98 cents better than estimates. The stock has gapped up as much as 7.2% this morning and it nearly came close to piercing $600 per share.
Here’s a look at Google’s stock along with its earnings-per-share. The share price is the blue line (left scale). The earnings is the gold line and it follows the right scale. The red line is Wall Street’s forecast.
I scaled the two axes at a ratio of 18-to-1 which means that the P/E Ratio is exactly 18 whenever the lines cross. (Note: Please don’t take 18 as my valuation of Google. I just thought the chart looks more readable using that ratio.)
From early 2010 to this summer’s low, Google’s P/E Ratio has been nearly cut in half. Here are two ifs — if Wall Street’s earnings forecast is correct and if Google trades at 18 times that, then the stock will be at $750 by the end of 2012. That’s a 27% gain over the next 14-and-a-half months.
-
Google Soars on Earnings
Eddy Elfenbein, July 15th, 2011 at 11:40 amLast month, I highlighted how inexpensive shares of Google ($GOOG) had become (which was actually a follow-up from a similar post in May).
I noted that the premium for Google’s valuation was just 8.8% based on this year’s earnings, and 6.5% based on next year’s. Yesterday, the company reported Q2 earnings of $8.74 per share which was 89 cents higher than estimates. The stock has been up as much as $71 today.
-
CWS Market Review – July 15, 2011
Eddy Elfenbein, July 15th, 2011 at 8:10 amThe second-quarter earnings season has officially begun. Very soon we’ll get a handle on how well Corporate America fared during the second three months of the year. So far, we’ve had good earnings reports from companies like Google ($GOOG) and Yum Brands ($YUM). If all goes well, this earnings season will mark a new all-time record for corporate profits.
The current earnings record was set during the second quarter of 2007 when the S&P 500 earned $24.06. Not long after, things fell apart in a serious way. The good news is that we’ve recovered strongly. Wall Street’s current consensus for this year’s Q2 is $24.13 which would be a new record although not by much (and less than inflation over the last four years). Still, it’s nearly a 75% increase over the Q2 earnings of 2009. More importantly for us, the S&P 500 is over 15% lower than it was four years ago today despite earnings being higher.
Let me explain what’s happening. The earnings outlook is still very favorable for most companies. The S&P 500 has a shot of earning $100 this year and perhaps as much as $112 next year. However, earnings growth is decelerating, meaning that earnings are growing but at a slower rate. Second-quarter earnings will probably come in around 15% higher than last year’s Q2.
This slowing rate of growth is concerning many money managers and that’s part of the reason why the market has been jittery lately. Consider that every day this week, the S&P 500 has closed more than 1% below its high for the day. Simply put, the very easy money has been made. Now folks are madly searching for bargains and anything less than perfection gets tossed aside.
I’ll give you an example of what I mean: DuPont ($DD) will probably earn close to $4 per share this year. At the low from 2009, the stock was going for just over $16 per share. In other words, DuPont’s stock was going for just four times earnings from just two years into the future! And we’re not talking about some unknown pink sheet listing. This is a Dow component and one of the largest industrial companies in the world. It was a stock screaming to be bought (and yes, I missed it).
Now let’s look at what’s been happening to DuPont. Three months ago, the company reported very solid earnings for Q1 (15 cents higher than the Street) and raised expectations. So what did the stock do? It went down. Two months after the earnings report, DuPont was trading 10% lower than before its earnings report.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mean to pick on DuPont; it’s a fine company. But I want to show you just how nervous investors have become, especially about cyclical stocks. Since mid-February, the Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index (^CYC) has trailed the S&P 500 by roughly 3.5%. When a stock that’s delivering on earnings is getting smacked around, you know something’s up. The lesson here is that investors have been scared and they’ve been looking for reasons to sell. When the problems in Europe came along, that seemed like as good a time as any.
What investors need to understand is that the earnings are still out there, but they’re not nearly as easy to find as they used to be. Another example is JPMorgan Chase ($JPM), a Buy List stock, which reported very good earnings on Thursday. For last year’s Q4 and this year’s Q1, I was highly confident that JPM was going to beat the Street’s estimate, and I was right both times. This time around, I wasn’t nearly as certain. Many financial stocks are in rough shape. I’m particularly leery of companies like Citigroup ($C), Bank of America ($BAC) and Morgan Stanley ($MS). I’m afraid their earnings reports will not be pretty.
The good news is that JPM came through once again. The bank earned $1.27 per share for Q2 which was six cents higher than Wall Street’s consensus. Although Thursday was a down day for the broader stock market, shares of JPM closed higher by 1.84% (and were up as much as 4% during the trading day).
Similar to the story at DuPont, JPMorgan’s business has been doing well but investors have been skittish of the stock. In this case, the focus is on the bank’s exposure to Europe, although CEO Jamie Dimon has tried to calm those fears. One of the fears going into Thursday’s earnings report was that fixed-income trading had plunged. Fortunately, this was not the case.
I was especially impressed by the news that JPM is going to float a 30-year bond. No major bank has done that in six months. Bloomberg noted that the market is becoming more convinced of JPM’s creditworthiness. In October, the bank floated 30-year bonds that were 165 basis points higher than similarly-dated U.S. Treasuries. Now that spread is down to 115 basis points. That’s a good sign, so it’s smart to take advantage of the market’s judgment and raise some cash.
Although JPM has been a poorly performing stock for the last three months, I still like the shares. I would like them a lot better if the company could double its dividend (the Fed would need to sign off on that). The bottom line is that money is cheap, the yield curve is wide and the stock is down. All of that combines for a good case in owning JPM. I’m keeping my buy-below price at $44 per share.
I don’t know yet when all of the companies on our Buy List will report Q2 earnings (be sure to check the blog for updates), but I do know that three of our healthcare stocks are due to report next week. Both Stryker ($SYK) and Johnson & Johnson ($JNJ) will report on Tuesday, July 19, and Abbott Laboratories ($ABT) will report on Wednesday, July 20th.
Of the three, Stryker is the most compelling buy right now. The company impressed Wall Street earlier this year when it gave very strong full-year guidance of $3.65 to $3.73 per share. Importantly, they’ve reaffirmed that guidance since then. Even though Stryker beat earnings by a penny per share in April, the stock hasn’t done much of anything. The Street expects 90 cents per share for Q2. That sounds about right though maybe a penny or two too low. I don’t think SYK will have any trouble hitting their optimistic range for this year. Stryker is a good buy up to $60.
After doing nearly everything wrong, Johnson & Johnson is finally on the right path again. The company recently raised its quarterly dividend for the 49th year in a row. In April, JNJ gave us a strong earnings report and upped its full-year forecast to $4.90 to $5 per share. Wall Street expects $1.23 for Q2; I think $1.30 is doable.
At the current price, JNJ yields 3.37% which is more than a 10-year Treasury bond. The stock has been in a mostly losing battle with the $70 barrier for more than six years. If next week’s earnings come in strong, I think JNJ will finally burst through $70 for good. Just to be ready, I’m raising my buy price on JNJ to $70.
Wall Street expects Abbott Labs to earn $1.11 per share for its second quarter. The company has topped Wall Street’s forecast by one penny per share for the last six quarters. I don’t like surprises on my Buy List so let’s make it seven in a row. The company has already forecast full-year earnings of $4.54 to $4.64 per share. That’s a big number and if it’s right (which I think it is), that means that ABT is going for just 11.6 times the mid-point of that forecast. The shares currently yield 3.61%. I’m raising my buy on Abbott from $52 to $54.
That’s all for now. Be sure to keep visiting the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
-
The Google Carry Trade
Eddy Elfenbein, May 17th, 2011 at 1:41 pmGoogle ($GOOG), which is some sort of technology outfit similar to Alta Vista, has decided to go to the bond market to raise $3 billion.
Here’s the odd bit: Google is sitting on $35 billion in cash. However, they can’t use most of that since it’s outside the U.S. (they funnel their money though Ireland). If Google repatriates those dollars, they’ll be hit with a massive tax bill. The company is probably assuming that the corporate tax rate will go down in the future and they’re probably right.
So it’s off to the bond market they go. Naturally, with all that cash, you can be pretty sure that Google is a good credit risk—and the bond market agrees.
The world’s biggest Internet-search company split the sale evenly between three-, five- and 10-year notes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The 1.25 percent, three-year notes yield 33 basis points more than similar-maturity Treasuries, the 2.125 percent, five-year debt pays a 43 basis-point spread, and the 3.625 percent, 10-year securities offer 58 basis points above benchmarks, Bloomberg data show.
Even though Google didn’t snag a AAA credit rating, the bond market gave them spreads as if they were AAA.
This is definitely a smart move by Google. Let’s look at Google’s earnings yield (which is the inverse of the P/E Ratio). Based on this year’s earnings estimate, Google’s earnings yield is 6.42%. Based on next year’s, it’s 7.48%. Even going by last year’s earnings, it’s still 5.60%.
In other words, Google’s yield on its equity is far higher than its yield on its debt. The lesson is to use debt. In fact, I think an interesting trade would be to play Google’s risk premium—go long Google’s stock and short the bonds. This is effectively what a company does when it issues bonds to buy back its stock (or in the 1980s when many companies LBO’d themselves).
-
How Much Is Google Really Worth?
Eddy Elfenbein, May 4th, 2011 at 3:19 pmGoogle ($GOOG) certainly gets a lot of attention but the stock really hasn’t done that well over the past few years. Three-and-a-half years ago, the stock was around $725 per share. Since then, Google has slightly underperformed the S&P 500 (plus the S&P 500 pays a dividend and Google doesn’t).
So how much should Google be worth? That’s hard to say. Let’s take a very basic look. Wall Street currently expects Google to earn $33.90 per share this year.
The S&P 500 is currently trading at 13.85 times this year’s earnings estimate. If Google were carrying that multiple, it would be about $470 per share.
However, Google is projected to grow its earnings faster than the overall market. Wall Street currently expects Google to earn $39.49 per share in 2012. The S&P 500 is going for 12.2 times next year’s estimate. So if Google carried that multiple, it would be $481 per share.
In other words, Google’s growth premium adds some value but not a whole lot. The current price of $537 assumes a growth premium that lasts well into the future — and in my opinion — too far of a distance to make a reasonable estimate.
This is a very rough estimate of Google’s price. What I mean to show you is the amount of future growth investors are placing in Google’s price. Sure, it may pay off, but consider that Google’s much-hoped-for future hasn’t paid off over the last three-and-a-half years.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005