Posts Tagged ‘hpq’
-
Hewlett-Packard Is Lower Than it Was 18 Years Ago
Eddy Elfenbein, November 20th, 2012 at 11:13 amRemarkably, Hewlett-Packard ($HPQ) still finds ways to disappoint investors. The stock is now lower than where it was 18 years ago. $HPQ has gone from 10 cents per share in 1964 to $67 in 2000 back to $12 today.
Earlier this year, HPQ got to $30 and in 2010 it got as high as $49. Two years ago, when the stock was at $42, I was warning investors to stay away from HPQ. I reiterated that advice again, again and again.
-
Hewlett-Packard Plunges
Eddy Elfenbein, October 3rd, 2012 at 2:45 pmShares of Hewlett-Packard ($HPQ) plunged as low as $15.15 today as Meg Whitman projected a profit next year between $3.40 and $3.60 per share. Wall Street has been expecting $4.18 per share.
This stock has been absolutely clobbered. Earlier this year, HPQ got to $30 and in 2010 it got as high as $49. Two years ago, when the stock was at $42, I was warning investors to stay away from HPQ. I reiterated that advice again, again and again.
As an investor, whenever you hear the words “growth through acquisition” — run!
-
Stay Away from Hewlett-Packard
Eddy Elfenbein, February 23rd, 2012 at 1:03 pmLast year, when Hewlett-Packard ($HPQ), was trading at $43, I warned investors to get out. Today, it’s at $27.
This is unfortunate because HPQ could be a very good company; but right now, it’s a big mess. I don’t think they even know what business they’re in. After yesterday’s close, Hewlett came out with a horrible earnings report. Earnings dropped 32% (but actually beat expectations), and the company guided lower for this quarter.
The shares have been down as much as 7.2% today, although they’ve come back some. This must be very frustrating for shareholders because until today, the stock had been doing fairly well coming off its October low. And that was very lowly low.
For now, Hewlett-Packard is sticking with is full-year guidance of $4 per share, so you might be thinking, “Hey, $4 ain’t too shabby from a $28 stock.” Not so fast. This is a classic value trap. HPQ isn’t down because it’s cheap. It’s down because it’s lost. Hewlett-Packard is a long, long way from being healthy. Meg Whitman herself said that it will take years before HPQ is competitive again.
I repeat, Hewlett-Packard is a sell.
-
So Long Moammar, Wall Street Rallies
Eddy Elfenbein, August 22nd, 2011 at 9:36 amThanks to the good news coming out of Libya, the stock market looks to rally strongly this morning. Wall Street is focused on two events coming this Friday. The first is that the government will revise its report on second-quarter GDP growth. The initial report said that the economy expanded by just 1.3% for the second three months of the year. Wall Street expects that to be pared to 1.1%.
The other even is that Ben Bernanke will be giving a speech at the Fed’s annual shindig in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. This is where one year ago Bernanke announced the Fed’s plans for the second round of quantitative easing. Some analysts think this is the time he’ll unveil a third program to buy Treasury bonds (i.e., QE3).
Personally, I doubt that will happen although there could be a sort of extra buying announced. The reality is that the long-term bond market is vastly overstretched. Either the bond market thinks we’re going into a recession or they’re expect more Fed bond purchases. Still, I find myself looking at a third option which is that the bond market is just plain wrong on this. In deference to Jimmy McMillan, bond prices are too damn high and stock prices are too low.
One mistake that investors often make is that a lower price doesn’t necessarily mean that a stock is a good buy. It only means that the stock is cheaper than where it was. Earlier this year, shares of Hewlett-Packard ($HPQ) got chopped from $48 to $41 after the company announced poor earnings guidance. I got a lot of email asking me if HPQ was a good buy. According to the numbers, the answer was “yes,” but my answer was “no, HPQ is a sell.”
That’s a good example of when we have to see the numbers for what they are. They’re only a reflection of business reality, not business reality itself. When we take a closer look at what’s happening at HPQ, we can see that things haven’t been going well.
This is what I wrote six months ago in a post called, “Hewlett-Packard Is Cheap, For Good Reason.”
Since Hurd left HPQ, I’ve been down on the stock and fortunately I look smart today by telling investors to stay away six months ago. My concern is that the company’s aggressive acquisition plans may be doing more harm than good. HPQ has been going after IBM’s business in a big way and they’ve been shelling out major bucks to do it. I hated the 3Com purchase and the Palm acquisition still gives me nightmares. At the time, I gave Hurd the benefit of the doubt. Now that he’s gone, that benefit is also gone.
It boils down to the question: “Can new CEO Léo Apotheker engineer a turnaround from the previous turnaround?”
I say all of this in the context of last week’s earnings report. Hewlett-Packard reported earnings of $1.36 per share which was seven cents more than Wall Street’s forecast. Wall Street responded by tossing the shares in the garbage. The shares dropped nearly 10% on Wednesday. Since the stock is a Dow component, the plunge distorted the entire index.
What freaked out Wall Street so much? Let’s dig into the numbers. The hitch was that quarterly revenue rose only 4% to $32.30 billion from $32.96 billion. Wall Street had been expecting $32.96 billion. In the wider scope of things, that’s really not a big miss, so what else was going on?
Hewlett-Packard also gave guidance for Q2 and the entire year. For this quarter, HPQ said it expects revenues between $31.4 billion and $31.6 billion, and earnings-per-share between $1.19 and $1.21. Wall Street didn’t like that at all. The consensus was for revenues of $32.6 billion and earnings of $1.25 per share.
HPQ’s full-year forecast (their fiscal year ends in October) was for total revenues between $130 billion and $131.5 billion. The consensus on Wall Street was for $132.91 billion. HPQ said it expects full-year earnings to range between $5.20 and $5.28 per share. The Street was expecting $5.23 per share, so I suppose that’s inline. HPQ has traditionally issued conservative forecasts so they can raise them later. Perhaps they’re doing that now to mask the poor Q2 guidance.
So this seems odd. It appears that HPQ gave lousy near-term guidance but the long-term guidance is still what the Street expects. Yet the stock’s popularity is somewhere between Kim Jong-il and Diphtheria. (Did Hurd get out at the right time? Sure looks like it.)
According to the company’s guidance, the stock is selling for just eight times earnings. The good sign is that their enterprise storage, servers and networking division saw its revenues increase by 22%. Also, the gross margins are up 1.5% to 23.4%.
The stock is tempting, but I’m still steering clear.
HPQ has a few problems to work through. They’re experiencing weakness in consumer PCs and services. I’m also not a big fan of the quality of their earnings. Always be wary when a company grows too much through acquisition. That’s often a sign of trouble. A company should be focused on making earnings not buying them.
When I wrote that, the shares were at $43. Now they’re at $23.
-
HPQ Cuts Forecast, You Heard It Here First
Eddy Elfenbein, May 17th, 2011 at 9:30 amI often caution investors against investing by the numbers alone. Just because a stock has a low Price/Earnings Ratio or high Return-On-Equity doesn’t mean it’s a good buy. Those are often indicators of good buys but you need to look behind the numbers as well.
A good example of this came in February when shares of Hewlett-Packard ($HPQ) got hammered after its earnings report. A lot of people asked me if I thought HPQ was a good buy. This is what I had to say in my post Hewlett-Packard Is Cheap, For Good Reason:
Hewlett-Packard reported earnings of $1.36 per share which was seven cents more than Wall Street’s forecast. Wall Street responded by tossing the shares in the garbage. The shares dropped nearly 10% on Wednesday. Since the stock is a Dow component, the plunge distorted the entire index.
What freaked out Wall Street so much? Let’s dig into the numbers. The hitch was that quarterly revenue rose only 4% to $32.30 billion from $32.96 billion. Wall Street had been expecting $32.96 billion. In the wider scope of things, that’s really not a big miss, so what else was going on?
Hewlett-Packard also gave guidance for Q2 and the entire year. For this quarter, HPQ said it expects revenues between $31.4 billion and $31.6 billion, and earnings-per-share between $1.19 and $1.21. Wall Street didn’t like that at all. The consensus was for revenues of $32.6 billion and earnings of $1.25 per share.
HPQ’s full-year forecast (their fiscal year ends in October) was for total revenues between $130 billion and $131.5 billion. The consensus on Wall Street was for $132.91 billion. HPQ said it expects full-year earnings to range between $5.20 and $5.28 per share. The Street was expecting $5.23 per share, so I suppose that’s inline. HPQ has traditionally issued conservative forecasts so they can raise them later. Perhaps they’re doing that now to mask the poor Q2 guidance.
So this seems odd. It appears that HPQ gave lousy near-term guidance but the long-term guidance is still what the Street expects. Yet the stock’s popularity is somewhere between Kim Jong-il and Diphtheria. (Did Hurd get out at the right time? Sure looks like it.)
According to the company’s guidance, the stock is selling for just eight times earnings. The good sign is that their enterprise storage, servers and networking division saw its revenues increase by 22%. Also, the gross margins are up 1.5% to 23.4%.
The stock is tempting, but I’m still steering clear.
HPQ has a few problems to work through. They’re experiencing weakness in consumer PCs and services. I’m also not a big fan of the quality of their earnings. Always be wary when a company grows too much through acquisition. That’s often a sign of trouble. A company should be focused on making earnings not buying them.
I should add that things may change soon. On March 14th, Apotheker will unveil his business plan for Hewlett-Packard. (BTW, Léo, that shouldn’t take six months to do). I’m curious to hear what he has to say, but I don’t have enough confidence to buy before then. Until then, HPQ is a sell.
Sure enough, Hewlett-Packard cut that already-lowered forecast today. The company now says that sales for the year will be between $129 billion and $130 billion, and earnings will be $5 per share. Wall Street was expecting earnings for the May-June-July quarter of $1.23 per share. Instead, HPQ said it will be $1.08 per share.
Investors tend to think companies are like athletes and can shake off a bad night. Business generally doesn’t work that way. One problem leads to another problem and things can escalate very quickly. You should also be very skeptical of any company that relies on the strategy of “growth through acquisition.” Simply put, it rarely works.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005