Posts Tagged ‘intc’
-
Intel Is Back Where It Was in 1997
Eddy Elfenbein, November 14th, 2012 at 1:10 pmYesterday, I highlighted Microsoft ($MSFT) and its relatively cheap valuation. Today I want to look at a stock that’s often paired with Microsoft: Intel ($INTC). The stock has been doing terribly lately. Shares of Intel are at a fresh 52-week low today. In May, Intel was over $29 and today the stock nearly broke below $20 per share. The stock first broke above $20 in early 1997. That was the same year that Intel’s CEO, Andy Grove, was named Time’s “Man of the Year.”
Intel’s last earnings report wasn’t terribly good, but Wall Street’s expectations were even worse. For Q3, the company earned 58 cents per share which was eight cents better than estimates. Earnings were down 11% from the same period one year before. Sales were down by 5%.
After exceeding analysts’ expectations following the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the company’s sales in recent months have slowed as demand for its microchips has weakened. Fearing the trend could continue, several analysts last week cut their estimates of the chipmaker’s financial prospects, sending its stock price to its lowest level in a year.
While the sluggish worldwide economy has contributed to Intel’s troubles, a more fundamental worry is its dependence upon personal computers. Its brainy microprocessors power about 80 percent of PCs, whose sales have dwindled as consumers have turned to smartphones and tablets. As a result, Intel is trying to get its chips into those mobile devices.
The company is beginning to have some luck in that regard. But its chips face intense competition from those using an alternative design from British firm ARM Holdings. Traditionally consuming less energy and, thus, providing longer battery life, the ARM camp dominates the mobile device market.
Even if Intel has success with its push into smartphones, the company is likely to remain so dependent on the stagnant PC market that its finances probably won’t improve much over the next 18 months, according to a note Bernstein Research sent their clients last week.
Now let’s look at some numbers. Intel currently pays a quarterly dividend of 22.5 cents per share. This was raised from 21 cents per share earlier this year. At 90 cents for the year, a $20 share price works out to a big fat yield of 4.5%.
Intel’s earnings estimates for next year have been dropping like a stone. Three months ago, the Street had been expecting 2013 earnings of $2.55 per share. Today the consensus is for $1.97 per share. By my simple valuation method, Intel has a fair value of $27.41.
-
Intel Slides on Lower Guidance
Eddy Elfenbein, December 12th, 2011 at 1:12 pmIntel ($INTC) is getting clipped today on news that it’s lowering guidance.
Intel, a technology bellwether, said it now expected fourth-quarter revenue of $13.4 billion to $14 billion. It had previously forecast revenue of $14.2 billion to $15.2 billion for the holiday quarter.
Analysts polled by FactSet were expecting revenue of $14.65 billion.
Intel is the world’s largest maker of microprocessors, the brains of computers. The company said it expected personal computer sales to be up from the previous quarter. But it said computer makers are reducing inventories and microprocessor purchases because of hard drive shortages.
Intel has been a supremely frustrating stock for us because I’ve played it exactly wrong — or perhaps we were too early. Still, I always want to look at our bad calls to see what we can learn.
I had Intel on last year’s Buy List and it started off as a good position for us. By April, it was an 18% winner for us. The stock then dropped about 25% and recovered to make us a slight gain for the year but it still trailed the overall market.
After a lot of consideration, I felt that my original thesis no longer held and I decide to boot it from the Buy List for this year. Once again, I was right — at first. Intel underperformed the market at the beginning of this year, then around April it started a large out-performance.
The stock has beaten earnings pretty consistently for the past few years. I had even considered adding back on for 2012. But I couldn’t help feeling that Intel had over-run its value. Only today, now that 2011 is nearly over, do we see some cracks in the company’s business.
The lesson for investors is that your thesis can be right but it may take a long time to see it pay off. I remember Peter Lynch saying that his stocks did best in the second or third year that he owned them.
-
Intel — The Dividend Stock?
Eddy Elfenbein, May 13th, 2011 at 2:51 pmFor the second time in the last six months, Intel ($INTC) has increased its quarterly dividend. First it went from 15.75 cents to 18.12 cents per share. Now it’s going from 18.12 cents to 21 cents per share. (Just 18 months ago, Intel raised its dividend from 14 cents to 15.75 cents per share, so that’s a 50% increase in a year-and-a-half)
Going by yesterday’s closing price of $23.71, Intel now yields 3.42%. Jeff Reeves of Investorplace notes that Intel is now the fifth-highest yielding stock in the Dow.
Intel should easily make over $2.20 per share this year and next year, so the dividend is very safe. The company is also sitting on $12 billion in cash which is $2.20 per share.
I think shareholders ought to be pleased. I’m always leery when companies sit on too much cash. This is what Peter Lynch called “the Bladder Theory of Corporate Finance.” There’s nothing wrong with Intel rewarding its owners.
I also think we may be seeing a shift in the way investors view common stocks. This could be the beginning of a period where investors place more emphasis on dividends rather than earnings growth.
In the 1990s, no one would have believed me if I told them that Intel would be looked upon as an income stock in the not-too-distant future.
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005