Nicholas Financial’s Earnings
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 4th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

Great news! NICK made 28 cents a share (adjusting for two cents lost on swaps):

CLEARWATER, Fla., May 4, 2010 — Nicholas Financial, Inc. announced that for the three months ended March 31, 2010, net earnings, excluding change in fair value of interest rate swaps, increased 52% to $3,113,000 as compared to $2,048,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Per share diluted net earnings, excluding change in fair value of interest rate swaps, increased 44% to $0.26 as compared to $0.18 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. See reconciliations of the Non-GAAP measures below. Revenue increased 8% to $14,256,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $13,224,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
For the year ended March 31, 2010, net earnings, excluding change in fair value of interest rate swaps, increased 80% to $10,228,000 as compared to $5,673,000 for the year ended March 31, 2009. Per share diluted net earnings, excluding change in fair value of interest rate swaps, increased 74% to $0.87 for the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $0.50 for the year ended March 31, 2009. See reconciliations of the Non-GAAP measures below. Revenue increased 6% to $56,472,000 for the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $53,102,000 for the year ended March 31, 2009.
According to Peter L. Vosotas, Chairman and CEO, “Our positive results for the fourth quarter and year were favorably impacted by a solid increase in revenues and a reduction in the net charge-off percentage of 41% and 26% for the three and twelve months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. We plan to open three to five new branch locations this year and will continue to evaluate additional markets for future branch locations.”

Wow, the provision for credit losses dropped to 3.01%!! That’s huge! That’s the lowest since September 2007. This was another very good quarter for Nicholas.
Let’s run through some of the numbers. Most of my forecasts were pretty close to the mark. Average receivables rose to $229.4 million. I said to expect $230 million. Revenue was $14.2 million. I was expecting $14.5 million.
I pegged interest expense to rise to 2.4% but it rose even higher to 2.66%. However, NICK’s debt actually fell from last quarter so total interest expense was $1.5 million. I was expecting $1.4 million.
Even though I was slightly overly optimistic on those projections, I was too pessimistic on the provision for credit losses. I thought it would fall to 4.8%. Instead, it fell all the way to 3.01%. That made all the difference.
Twenty-eight cents is great news. Congratulations to everyone at Nicholas. This was a job well done.
The company made $3 million in three months. Now that cash can be used to grow the portfolio or pay down debt. If they keep this up, then NICK should easily make $1.10 for this calendar year.
For stat geeks, here are the numbers.

The World’s Simplest Portfolio
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 4th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

Scott Adams of Dilbert fame gives us his suggestion for the World’s Simplest Portfolio (“that is better than what the average money managing expert might concoct”).
He suggests half in the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and half in the Vanguard Emerging Market ETF (VWO).
That’s not bad, but I can make it even simpler—put all of your money is a Treasury set for the date you need the money. Simple, right? Even better, use a zero-coupon Treasury which is like automatically reinvesting your dividends.
You can skip the transaction costs by buying the bond right from the Treasury. Your default risk is nil.
There’s a chance that you might not perform as well as the market as a whole, but over the past few decades, the equity premium hasn’t been much to write home about. Plus, most of the premium would be eaten away by expenses, even tiny ones from Vanguard.
If you were to design a ratio of Performance-to-Headaches, this portfolio is hard to beat.

This chart above shows how the two ETFs Adams recommends have performed, plus the American Century Target 2025 fund which I’m including as a proxy for long-term Treasuries.

Ouch!
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 4th, 2010 at 10:52 am

The market is getting hit hard today. The S&P 500 is down to 1176. The real problem is coming from cyclical stocks. The Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index (^CYC) is now down -3.36% compared with just -1.38% for the Consumer Index (^CMR).
On our Buy List, AFLAC (AFL) is now below $49 which is a very good entry point. Leucadia National (LUK) and Eaton Vance (EV) are also off sharply.
If you’re looking for income, Reynolds American (RAI) currently yields 6.75%. Gilead Sciences (GILD) is turning into one of the best buys on the Buy List. Some major pharma has to be looking at GILD for a buyout.

This Just In: Members of Congress Say One Thing, Do Another
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 4th, 2010 at 9:57 am

Oopsie:

According to The Journal’s analysis of congressional disclosures, investment accounts of 13 members of Congress or their spouses show bearish bets made in 2008 via exchange-traded funds—portfolios that trade like stocks and mirror an index. These funds were leveraged; they used derivatives and other techniques to magnify the daily moves of the index they track.
(…)
In February, Sen. Johnny Isakson (R., Ga.) argued on the Senate floor that “we don’t need those speculating in the marketplace to take unfair advantage of the values of equities that are owned by Americans all over this country for the sake of making a buck on a short sale.”
On Oct. 8 and 9, 2008—as the Federal Reserve was bailing out American International Group Inc.—an account Sen. Isakson held invested more than $30,000 in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury and UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury, the records show. These are “leveraged short” funds, designed to gain $2 for each $1 drop in the daily value of U.S. Treasury bonds.
(…)
“I don’t trade on margin”—money borrowed from a broker to raise potential returns—Rep. Bachus said in an email, “and don’t consider my investments leveraged to any risky extent.” He added: “Never have I traded on nonpublic information, nor do I trade in financial stocks.”
Rep. Bachus made roughly $28,000 on his trades in options and leveraged ETFs in 2008, according to a Journal analysis, a figure he called “essentially correct.”
(…)
Rep. Shelley Berkley (D., Nev.), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, has been a critic of Wall Street. In a statement on the House floor Feb. 23, she said: “Representing Las Vegas, let me assure you, no casino on the planet behaves as irresponsibly and recklessly as Wall Street does. Wall Street ought to be ashamed, and take a lesson from the casino industry.”
An account held by her husband, Lawrence Lehrner, shows 57 trades in 2008 in ETFs designed to gain $2 for each $1 drop in the value of a market index, the disclosures show. Between July 25 and July 29, 2008—four months after Bear Stearns Cos. fell—records show four trades in and out of ProShares UltraShort Financial fund.

(Via: Falkenstein)

Earnings Preview for Nicholas Financial
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 4th, 2010 at 7:55 am

I’ve written a great deal about Nicholas Financial (NICK), probably more than any other stock. The company is a small firm that provides loans for used cars. If you’ve read this blog for some time, then it’s no secret to you that I believe the stock is going for a tremendous bargain and that the investing public doesn’t properly understand the company. Currently, no Wall Street firms follow the stock. I think I’m the only person who writes about Nicholas.
Here’s my take: I think investors have mistakenly lumped Nicholas in with other subprime lenders. They see “used car loans” and instandly think toxic debt. The major difference is that Nicholas doesn’t securitize its loans and the company is rather conservative in its accounting.
Make no mistake, Nicholas’ customers have been hit hard by the recession that has impacted the company’s portfolio, but Nicholas is still a fundamentally solid business. I’ve spoken with senior management a few times and each time, I’ve come out feeling that Nicholas is well-run and will thrive. I will also reveal that Nicholas is currently my largest personal holding.
The fiscal fourth-quarter earnings report is due out sometime this week. My forecast is that Nicholas will earn about 25 cents per share (give or take). I think it’s very possible that Nicholas will earn as much as $1.20 per share during this calendar year (I’ll say $1 a share is the low end). Now bear in mind that this is a stock currently going for $8.75, or about seven to eight times forward earnings.
Nicholas tends to be a fairly stable business except for one metric—provision for credit losses. In other words, bum loans. This number skyrocketed but it’s been coming down. Last quarter, it hit 5.34% which is nearly half what it was in September 2008. Every inch that number falls, it’s better for Nicholas. I’m hoping it will fall below 5% for this report. The provision for credit losses has fallen now for five straight quarters.
Even if my forecast if off by a little, I’m not worried at all. The valuation is so low that there’s an enormous margin of safety. This post probably best spells out why Nicholas is such a compelling buy.
Here are some very basic projections: I think that receivable will be about $230 million. The gross yield will be about 25.4% which will make revenues around $14.5 million. Interest expenses will rise to about 2.4% or about $1.4 million. This will make net revenues of about $13.1 million.
I’m pegging the provision for credit loss at 4.8%. Since the economy in Florida is still rough, this number will see smaller and smaller declines. Ultimately, I think NICK is worth $12 to $15 a share. This is an outstanding buy.
(Be warned that NICK is a micro-cap so that shares are somewhat illiquid. I actually prefer that. The stock can trade with a wide bid-ask spread. It’s also common for NICK to go a whole day without trading one share. This may frustrate some investors.)

The Stock Market’s Best Day in Two Month
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 3rd, 2010 at 6:08 pm

Today was a good day for Wall Street. The S&P 500 is back over 1200 as the index posted its best gain since March 5. The S&P 500 gained 1.31% today while our Buy List did slightly better gaining 1.43%. The only sore spot was Sysco (SYY) which dropped 1.6% after it reported decent earnings (don’t ask me).
I was very pleased to see Nicholas Financial (NICK) close at $8.75 which is a new two-year high. The company is set to report earnings this week and I’m expecting EPS of around 25 cents a share. I continue to believe this is a hugely under-priced stock.
I think I might get in trouble for writing this on the Internet, but this earnings season has been very, very good.

The first-quarter earnings season is shaping up to be one of the strongest in decades. About two-thirds of S&P 500-stock index companies reported earnings by last Friday, with 78% beating analysts’ estimates, according to Thomson Reuters. And they beat them by an impressive 16.3% on average. If that rate holds, it will be the highest since 1994.
That performance has come amid signs of broad-based, sustainable growth. Fourth-quarter earnings were influenced by strong financial-sector results; strength appears to be more widely spread in the first quarter.
Excluding financials, year-on-year earnings growth is tracking at about 35% in the first quarter, up from 18% in the fourth quarter. Nine in 10 companies in the technology and consumer-discretionary sectors have beaten estimates.

The Lloyd and Charlie Show
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 3rd, 2010 at 1:59 pm

Lloyd Blankfein sits down to chat with Charlie Rose (this video is 51 minutes).

S&P 500 Total Return Index
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 3rd, 2010 at 12:49 pm

Here’s a look at the S&P 500’s Total Return Index which includes reinvested dividends:

Even after an impressive rally, we’re still below where we were 10 years ago. Inflation, or at least the official measures of inflation, show that prices are up close to 30% from 10 years ago.

January 2011 $2.50 Goldman Sachs Puts
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 3rd, 2010 at 11:09 am

Timothy Collins reports:

In case anyone is interested, the January 2011 $2.50 Goldman Sachs puts – yes, $2.50 puts — are trading at 2 cents by 3 cents.

Hmmm. I’ll wait and see.

Buffett Talks Business
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 3rd, 2010 at 10:44 am

(Via: Ritholtz)